Skip to main content

Should the manager concentrate on the task or the people?


Many business communication scholars and theorists consider a task-oriented manager as autocratic, but in some instances it is necessary to separate the task from the  employee performing that task.  This post explores when it is necessary for the manager to stay objective and to focus only on the task.

Typically in a task oriented business environment, employees are doing a specialised  kind of task and receive instructions from the top. The business offers a limited amount of goods and services. Employees are expected to follow  instructions to complete their tasks,  know exactly what are expected from them and how they will be compensated when they achieve their goals  for the month.  Rules are important in this kind of environment, but employees often consider this as a sign that they are perceived as being untrustworthy.  Many employees embrace the opportunity to specialise in an environment where they can safely follow a routine. However, modern businesses that offer many different products and services rather adopt a human relations approach or strive to be a learning organisation. A task-oriented business applies principles that are totally  contrary to a learning organisation where the business grows by using the expertise and knowledge from its employees to instill innovation.  The manager is part of this learning process and encourages learning (see my post on the learning organisation).  In a human relations business environment, the happiness of employees and building relationships with employees are the most important consideration.

In my view the ideal of course is that both the task and the employee should be considered by the manager.  At the end the business also has to look after itself to achieve its financial objectives.  But the employee performing that task plays a huge role in that and wants to feel empowered.

But when should the manager consider the task and not the person who is performing the task?

There could be more examples, but I would say that particularly during annual performance appraisals of employees, the manager should separate the employee from the task.  The  manager needs to consider whether the employee actually did what he or she was paid to do and has to stay objective, especially if that employee did not perform well.  Being honest with an employee about his or her work performance might discourage the employee, but it can also help the employee to grow and to learn.  Learning is also about becoming aware of your own shortcomings and to try to improve.  If the manager has good relationships with employees, this might be a very hard thing to do, but at the end both the business and the employee will fail.

Can you think of other instances?

Popular posts from this blog

The role of the manager in effective business communication

Business communication is no longer about how to write a letter, email or use effective writing skills.  It has also extended to other areas in the business, for example, excellent relationships within the business. A manager should not only concentrate on successful communication with its external clients, customers and stakeholders.  The employees of the business actually areinternal clientsand should also be treated with care.  Many scholars refer to this asinternal marketing, a very important feature of good business communication.  Employees’ well-being and work satisfaction play a large role in their productivity and how loyal they will be towards the business.  The role of the manager is to ensure good relationships with and among employees.   A healthy working environment is equally important.  Previous research has indicated that employees also have other career aspirations than only a salary.
Unhappy employees as a result of poor communication processes in the business can ne…

Obstacles in achieving efficient cross cultural communication

Effective cross cultural communication is increasingly becoming more important in a business. Employees usually consist of diverse cultures with different backgrounds.  Although all employees need to adhere to the corporate culture in a business (the way things are usually done), a manager needs to have good cross cultural communication skills when it comes to dealing with employees with different cultural backgrounds.  Many managers want to achieve better cultural communication, but still face many barriers.  The following are the most common cross cultural communication barriers many managers still have to overcome in their attempt to communicate better with diverse employees:
Values and attitudes: The manager may have different values than his or her employees or the employees may even have different values and attitudes. At the end of the day it is the task that has to be completed and having different values and attitudes can be overcome if all employees all share a common vision …

What is your managerial communication style?

As a manager you communicate in a specific manner to your employees.  Your communication style can fall within different managerial approaches but in this article I will focus on the two most common styles, namely the classical and humanistic managerial communication styles.  I will first explain the more formal classical style.
A manager who has a classical managerial (authoritarian) communication style:
communicates through formal communication media such as oral and/or written and visual communication and very little face to face discussions.creates but also uses opportunities to make the long and short term goals of the business clear using these formal communication media.changes 'unacceptable’ attitudes and opinions by shaping new ones through manipulation.diminishes fear and suspicion because of misinformation or misinterpretation of the right but unclear information.communicates numerous rules to employees.prevents or corrects misunderstanding from lack of information and pr…