Skip to main content

An Honest Impression of 360 Peer Evaluation and Feedback

Have you received an invitation, especially on LinkedIn to evaluate one of your peers via the 360 evaluation process?  I recently accepted a colleague's invitation to be peer reviewed in this manner and in this post I want to give my honest impression of this evaluation process.

But first how does it work?  It is a web-based peer evaluation system where the reviewer has to drag the 18 most positive attributes of the colleague to another box, then those most likely to be associated with the colleague, and then lastly those least likely to be associated with the colleague.  In addition you have to single out attributes needing attention.  You have to drag 18 attributes for each category and are then left with all attributes not dragged over and thus being forced to associate them with the least likely to be associated with the colleague.  The process seems quite fine until you reach the least likely category.  Even if you do not necessarily agree with the attribute you are forced to drag it to the box.  And this is where I have a problem with the evaluation, namely being forced to drag all remaining attributes to the least likely to be associated with box.

The biggest advantage is that peers are perhaps in a better position to evaluate a colleague's work than the supervisor who is not always working that closely with the colleague. All strengths and weaknesses can also be identified.  The biggest disadvantage, however, is that you are forced to drag all attributes not previously selected to the colleague's least likely to be associated with category or that the reviewer will not be that honest

Popular posts from this blog

The role of the manager in effective business communication

Business communication is no longer about how to write a letter, email or use effective writing skills.  It has also extended to other areas in the business, for example, excellent relationships within the business. A manager should not only concentrate on successful communication with its external clients, customers and stakeholders.  The employees of the business actually areinternal clientsand should also be treated with care.  Many scholars refer to this asinternal marketing, a very important feature of good business communication.  Employees’ well-being and work satisfaction play a large role in their productivity and how loyal they will be towards the business.  The role of the manager is to ensure good relationships with and among employees.   A healthy working environment is equally important.  Previous research has indicated that employees also have other career aspirations than only a salary.
Unhappy employees as a result of poor communication processes in the business can ne…

Obstacles in achieving efficient cross cultural communication

Effective cross cultural communication is increasingly becoming more important in a business. Employees usually consist of diverse cultures with different backgrounds.  Although all employees need to adhere to the corporate culture in a business (the way things are usually done), a manager needs to have good cross cultural communication skills when it comes to dealing with employees with different cultural backgrounds.  Many managers want to achieve better cultural communication, but still face many barriers.  The following are the most common cross cultural communication barriers many managers still have to overcome in their attempt to communicate better with diverse employees:
Values and attitudes: The manager may have different values than his or her employees or the employees may even have different values and attitudes. At the end of the day it is the task that has to be completed and having different values and attitudes can be overcome if all employees all share a common vision …

What is your managerial communication style?

As a manager you communicate in a specific manner to your employees.  Your communication style can fall within different managerial approaches but in this article I will focus on the two most common styles, namely the classical and humanistic managerial communication styles.  I will first explain the more formal classical style.
A manager who has a classical managerial (authoritarian) communication style:
communicates through formal communication media such as oral and/or written and visual communication and very little face to face discussions.creates but also uses opportunities to make the long and short term goals of the business clear using these formal communication media.changes 'unacceptable’ attitudes and opinions by shaping new ones through manipulation.diminishes fear and suspicion because of misinformation or misinterpretation of the right but unclear information.communicates numerous rules to employees.prevents or corrects misunderstanding from lack of information and pr…